It started with forty acres of sagebrush in Utah County, bought in 1979 so a father's sons could turn it into a sod farm and earn money for college. Decades later, one of those sons heard a friend was using nanotechnology to improve a dry-cleaning business and wondered whether the same idea could do something for a farm. The trials that followed beat industry standards — and the sod farm became an agtech company. 

That company is Nano-Yield, and its co-founder and CEO, Clark Bell, joins us this week on Agbioscience. Nano-Yield builds a nanoparticle delivery system that helps plants take up the fertilizer and crop protection already going on the field — more from existing inputs rather than more inputs, and it's earned the company a 2026 Stevie Award for agricultural innovation, an EY Entrepreneur of the Year finalist nod, and a No. 2,539 ranking on the 2026 Inc. 5000 on 127% three-year growth. 

Highlights include: 

The core problem Nano-Yield is solving for farmers — and why this is the right moment for the technology 

Why "more efficiency from existing inputs" is landing now instead of "add another product" 

Nanotechnology in plain English: what a grower actually needs to understand about how it improves productivity 

What makes the science genuinely different from traditional fertilizer enhancement and other crop input technologies 

From a technical standpoint, what's happening inside the plant that allows the approach to improve performance and efficiency 

What growers have said as they integrated Nano-Yield into their operations 

The USDA backing tied to innovative domestic fertilizer production and business growth — how that support accelerates expansion and validates the opportunity 

Scaling without weakening the science or muddying the value proposition for the farmer 

The measurable results customers are seeing today in yield, nutrient efficiency, crop health and consistency 

A customer story that captures the impact of the technology 

Balancing innovation talk with what farmers care about most: return on investment and operational simplicity 

What the Stevie Award and EY finalist honors mean — and what they say about the company's maturity 

What will define success for Nano-Yield over the next year: adoption, farmer outcomes, partnerships, or something else

It started with forty acres of sagebrush in Utah County, bought in 1979 so a father's sons could turn it into a sod farm and earn money for college. Decades later, one of those sons heard a friend was using nanotechnology to improve a dry-cleaning business and wondered whether the same idea could do something for a farm. The trials that followed beat industry standards — and the sod farm became an agtech company.

That company is Nano-Yield, and its co-founder and CEO, Clark Bell, joins us this week on Agbioscience. Nano-Yield builds a nanoparticle delivery system that helps plants take up the fertilizer and crop protection already going on the field — more from existing inputs rather than more inputs, and it's earned the company a 2026 Stevie Award for agricultural innovation, an EY Entrepreneur of the Year finalist nod, and a No. 2,539 ranking on the 2026 Inc. 5000 on 127% three-year growth.

Highlights include:

The core problem Nano-Yield is solving for farmers — and why this is the right moment for the technology

Why "more efficiency from existing inputs" is landing now instead of "add another product"

Nanotechnology in plain English: what a grower actually needs to understand about how it improves productivity

What makes the science genuinely different from traditional fertilizer enhancement and other crop input technologies

From a technical standpoint, what's happening inside the plant that allows the approach to improve performance and efficiency

What growers have said as they integrated Nano-Yield into their operations

The USDA backing tied to innovative domestic fertilizer production and business growth — how that support accelerates expansion and validates the opportunity

Scaling without weakening the science or muddying the value proposition for the farmer

The measurable results customers are seeing today in yield, nutrient efficiency, crop health and consistency

A customer story that captures the impact of the technology

Balancing innovation talk with what farmers care about most: return on investment and operational simplicity

What the Stevie Award and EY finalist honors mean — and what they say about the company's maturity

What will define success for Nano-Yield over the next year: adoption, farmer outcomes, partnerships, or something else

YouTube Video VVVhNGU0WnYzY05pRFFRU25jVlA4NXhRLnR6WUpKaUQ3N1Zv

458. Nano-Yield's Clark Bell on fertilizer, nanotechnology + doing more with less

Picture a kitchen arena where 1,500 cooks from more than 40 countries have all won their way in — no open registrations, no fast track, just Golden Tickets earned at hundreds of qualifiers across the year. They cook in rounds, plate blind, and wait on the score. That's the World Food Championships, and it lands at the Indiana State Fairgrounds in Indianapolis October 15–18 for year two of a three-year run. 

It's also the event Mike McCloud founded in 2012, and the term he coined for it — Food Sport — has spent fourteen years becoming its own category. This week on Agbioscience, Mike joins us to talk about what happens when a live culinary tournament turns into something brands can test against, and what that means for agriculture on the other end of the plate. 

Highlights include: 

What "Food Sport" actually is — and how a live, multi-round tournament differs from a cooking show or a traditional culinary competition 

How WFC has evolved since 2012, and what has surprised Mike most across fourteen years 

Why you can't just sign up: inside the qualifying process, the 800+ sanctioned events, and the Golden Tickets that set the level of the field 

WFC as a product innovation lab — putting a brand's ingredient into the hands of hundreds of accomplished competitors, including required-ingredient final rounds like the Chef Category 

What a brand actually has to bring to an ingredient integration — and what "we tried it at WFC" gives a product team that a focus group or a test kitchen can't 

Stories of competitors using an ingredient in ways that changed how a brand thought about its own product 

Building a faster, more effective feedback loop between producers, manufacturers and innovators and the people who cook for a living 

What happens after the four days — the chef-brand relationships that outlast the event 

Indianapolis as home for three years, with 2026 as year two: why this market works and what the first two years have proven 

How a live culinary event intersects with Indiana's $70B+ agbioscience sector — production agriculture, food processing, animal health, plant science, agtech, food-is-health and bioinnovation — in ways people wouldn't expect 

Whether WFC can be a catalyst for moving Indiana corn, soy, pork, poultry, dairy and tomatoes downstream into value-added food and nutrition — and what that would take 

Mike's vision for WFC's next decade

Picture a kitchen arena where 1,500 cooks from more than 40 countries have all won their way in — no open registrations, no fast track, just Golden Tickets earned at hundreds of qualifiers across the year. They cook in rounds, plate blind, and wait on the score. That's the World Food Championships, and it lands at the Indiana State Fairgrounds in Indianapolis October 15–18 for year two of a three-year run.

It's also the event Mike McCloud founded in 2012, and the term he coined for it — Food Sport — has spent fourteen years becoming its own category. This week on Agbioscience, Mike joins us to talk about what happens when a live culinary tournament turns into something brands can test against, and what that means for agriculture on the other end of the plate.

Highlights include:

What "Food Sport" actually is — and how a live, multi-round tournament differs from a cooking show or a traditional culinary competition

How WFC has evolved since 2012, and what has surprised Mike most across fourteen years

Why you can't just sign up: inside the qualifying process, the 800+ sanctioned events, and the Golden Tickets that set the level of the field

WFC as a product innovation lab — putting a brand's ingredient into the hands of hundreds of accomplished competitors, including required-ingredient final rounds like the Chef Category

What a brand actually has to bring to an ingredient integration — and what "we tried it at WFC" gives a product team that a focus group or a test kitchen can't

Stories of competitors using an ingredient in ways that changed how a brand thought about its own product

Building a faster, more effective feedback loop between producers, manufacturers and innovators and the people who cook for a living

What happens after the four days — the chef-brand relationships that outlast the event

Indianapolis as home for three years, with 2026 as year two: why this market works and what the first two years have proven

How a live culinary event intersects with Indiana's $70B+ agbioscience sector — production agriculture, food processing, animal health, plant science, agtech, food-is-health and bioinnovation — in ways people wouldn't expect

Whether WFC can be a catalyst for moving Indiana corn, soy, pork, poultry, dairy and tomatoes downstream into value-added food and nutrition — and what that would take

Mike's vision for WFC's next decade

YouTube Video VVVhNGU0WnYzY05pRFFRU25jVlA4NXhRLnExRHdjX2kxM2VR

456. World Food Championships' Mike McCloud on building Food Sport + Indianapolis event this week